This research examines the harms that can arise when information about systematic and conflict-related sexual violence (SCRSV) is gathered, shared or used without respecting minimum ethical and survivor-centred standards. Based on interviews with survivors and experienced practitioners, as well as a review of existing literature, it shows how even well-intentioned actions can cause serious harm when risks are underestimated or survivors lose control over how their stories are handled.

The briefing highlights a wide range of harms, including physical and security harms, psychological and emotional harm, re-victimisation and retraumatisation, stigma and ostracisation, denied opportunities for justice and loss of trust in institutions. It also examines the broader harm that arises when an information-gathering or information-use process fails to achieve its stated purpose because it was not survivor-centred, was ineffective, or was unrealistic from the outset.

Drawing on examples from media coverage, humanitarian action, civil society documentation, academic research, international tribunals, and national courts, the note highlights harms that are often invisible but very real. It also shows how these harms can ripple outward, affecting not only survivors but also their families—especially their children—their communities, and the broader goals of healing, truth, and justice.

The briefing calls for more than good intentions. It underlines the need for meaningful informed consent, careful preparation, confidentiality safeguards and survivor-centred practice throughout the full information life cycle. In doing so, it supports a shift from simply trying to avoid harm to actively protecting survivors’ rights, dignity and well-being.